If the West's Russia-phobic psychosis continues — nuclear war is inevitable

27 June 2026

An accurately scary view of world affairs

Russia's Alexander Dugin recently published his perspective, regarding the West's long-standing Russia-phobia.

See:

Alexander Dugin, Operation Barbarossa: Then and Now, Multipolar Press (24 June 2026)

In that history-based essay

Dugin addresses late 1930s Britain's successful reorientation of the supposedly socialist-leaning Hitler into a Russia-hating, anti-socialist Russia-invader. As well as Stalin's naive inability to grasp that change in Hitler's geopolitical orientation.

Dugin maintains that the same Untermensch-despising mentality still prevails in Europe and the United States. I agree.

Although Dugin radically underestimates the horrors of Stalinist Sovietism, his take regarding the West's now equally disturbing anti-Russia psychosis is an existentially accurate one.

Importantly . . .

. . . because Dugin's view accurately reflects Russia's vulnerability to extermination at the West's hand, I interpret Dugin's patriotic nationalism to eventually require the Federation to fend off the West's increasingly maniacal assaults with the Federation's ample supply of nuclear weapons.

It is either that, or Russia be extinguished as a civilization.

Supposedly . . .

. . . the strategically pusillanimous President Putin may be coming around to share Dugin's uncompromising belief that acceding to the West's superiority psychosis is anti-Russian to its core.

See:

Foreign Agent Intel, History Repeats: The West's Eternal Crusade against Russia, foreignagentintel.substack.com (27 June 2026)

You will have to read Dugin's essay . . .

. . . to comprehend the detailed accuracy with which he sums the historical basis of the West's Ubermensch-based hostility toward Russia.

Once the scope of that hostility is grasped, we are likely to recognize that a nuclear defense of the Federation is very probably — and morally necessarily — on Time's horizon.

Dugin's view of Europe and America . . .

. . . is also indisputably correct.

Below are some extracts of what he had to say about that topic — my two clarifications appearing inside brackets:

A sovereign is someone who controls his own consciousness and the body of historical knowledge.

If foreign models are implanted into our [Russian] minds, then there is no need to conquer us militarily.

Today colonization proceeds through the information sphere, and in this respect our civilizational discourse is largely losing.

Trump won because he understands very well the structure of short cycles. The modern Western person’s attention cannot stay focused on anything for long.

He [Trump and/or the Western public] is no longer capable of reading a book, an article, or even a news item from beginning to end.

He needs everything very quickly, brightly, catchily, disconnected from what came before and without any connection to what follows.

It seems like idiocy — and that is exactly how consciousness works with certain mental defects: it instantly grasps something but does not connect it with the past or the future.

We are dealing with a real civilization of conscious, well-tempered idiocy that is not ashamed of it but actively promotes it.

Accelerationism is an invitation to a new form of mentality: forget what happened yesterday and don’t think about what will happen tomorrow.

Agreements are not observed by anyone in the West; no principles remain.

They promise one thing and do the exact opposite.

A reasonable question

Would you want to be locked up in a landscape with nuclear-armed opponents like the violent idiocracies that the United States and Europe have become?

The moral? — We in the West are (very probably) going to suicide ourselves . . .

. . . via our psychotic predation of other, arguably less foolish, cultures.

PeteFree.com

If the West's Russia-phobic psychosis continues — nuclear war is inevitable