Israel's Lebensraum logic — reincarnated Nazism under another flag

© 2021 Peter Free


17 May 2021



A mosquito bite justifies razing an entire people, doesn't it?


Zion's latest go-round of 'self-defensively' shooting Palestinians — for fun and profit — began with Israeli folk trying to uproot Arabs from East Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa Mosque some days ago.


When Hamas subsequently fired rockets into Israel for revenge, Zionists complained about being assaulted by terrorists.


Israel began shooting back with its gargantuanly more effective forces. That effort quickly escalated into yet another episode of Israel's "mowing the lawn" strategy for Untermensch Control.


Meanwhile — apparently so as to ensure that the international media had difficulty showing Israel's one-sided Gaza-flattening and murder campaign — Israel blew up the building that house Gaza's AP and Al Jazeera (media) offices.


All this was accomplished, without a peep out of Schutzstaffel-Zion's biggest supporter, the United States.



A currently circulating meme (about all this) is pertinent


In years past, a reportedly elderly Gaza man held up a sign with these words:



“You take my water, burn my olive trees, destroy my house, take my job, steal my land, imprison my father, kill my mother, bombard my country, starve us all, humiliate us all, but I am to blame: I shot a rocket back.”


© 2012 Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, The war between Israel and Hamas has its roots in Britain's shameful betrayal of the Palestinians, The Independent (UK) (18 November 2012)



The old man's sign is historically accurate


Zionists, who like to milk the Holocaust for all of the victimization that it is worth — and who diligently fund parading that memory before the world's publics — equally diligently ignore the fact that they stole Palestinian land to build Zion in the first place.


Israel's justification for the land grab was and remains the Old Testament. Whose logic, we are led to believe, was still operating in 1948, just after the second world war had ostensibly been won by a Liberty-loving alliance comprised of (allegedly) genuinely righteous peoples:



How actual history — and the Koran and Allah — got lost in the Israeli Origin scuffle, one wonders.


Maybe it was all the 'whitish' Western faces doing the reading.



And still today, according to Israel — and presumably Yaweh — it is ethically acceptable to unlawfully boot Palestinians out of East Jerusalem and anywhere they inconveniently have lived for generations. All in Apartheid-Lebensraum's 'holy' name.


It is certainly not okay — say Zionists — for Hamas to shoot (usually militarily ineffective) rockets back into Israel, under the (Hamas-benefiting) political claim of self-defense.


Untermensch, maintain Zion and Yaweh, must be squashed.


This is the Israeli strategic commandment that AP and Al Jazeera would have been reporting on — had they left been standing to do so — via a flow of photographs and video.



Patrick Gathara accurately summed the situation


He said that:



The idea that imperial land grabbers have the right to terrorise, brutalise, torture and murder those whose land they steal under the rubric of “self-defence” flies in the face of UN General Assembly Resolution 37/43 of 1982[.]


[That resolution] recognised “the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial and foreign domination and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle”.


That resolution specifically reaffirmed this right in the case of the Palestinian struggle.


Thus, today in Gaza, rather than seeking “moral clarity”, the West is using moral obfuscation to justify attacks on a refugee population by a colonial power that has evicted them from their land, blockades them in what is, in essence, an open-air prison, and then claims the right to do so in peace and quiet.


© 2021 Patrick Gathara, The fallacy of the colonial ‘right to self-defence’, Al Jazeera (16 May 2021)



It is impossible to argue with Gathara and simultaneously retain a grip on both reason and ethics.



The moral? — Notice the West's hypocrisy


Had China or Russia similarly squelched the Press — by literally blowing it up, especially while doing something else nefarious — we in America would be yelling about the Devil's assault on Speech. And then called for the Avenging Angels of Armageddon to ride forth.


Justice entirely depends upon who is bribing whom. And what 'holy' untruths one subscribes to.