Will the Deep State's creature — Robert Mueller — ever slither his ethically slimy carcass out of human sight?

© 2019 Peter Free

 

04 April 2019

 

 

The fact that Robert Mueller was "hired" to coup d'état President Trump is evident

 

. . . even from the "have it both ways" manner in which he submitted his final report to Attorney General William Barr.

 

For background, see here and here.

 

 

Is "competent slimeball" a just description of Mueller?

 

From the New York Times:

 

 

Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

 

The officials and others interviewed declined to flesh out why some of the special counsel’s investigators viewed their findings as potentially more damaging for the president than Mr. Barr explained . . . .

 

Mr. Barr and other Justice Department officials believe the special counsel’s investigators fell short of their task by declining to decide whether Mr. Trump illegally obstructed the inquiry, according to the two government officials.

 

After Mr. Mueller made no judgment on the obstruction matter, Mr. Barr stepped in to declare that he himself had cleared Mr. Trump of wrongdoing.

 

[A]ccording to officials familiar with the attorney general’s thinking, he and his aides limited the details they revealed because they were worried about wading into political territory.

 

© 2019  Nicholas Fandos, Michael S. Schmidt and Mark Mazzetti, Some on Mueller’s Team Say Report Was More Damaging Than Barr Revealed, New York Times (03 April 2019) (extracts)

 

 

AG Barr's implied perspective is understandable

 

If Mueller had found something — whether about President Trump's alleged collusion with Russia, or his widely suspected obstruction of that investigation — he should have said (or leaked) so, clearly.

 

Instead, the wily "special counsel" appears to have dodged that political bullet. Inferably not wishing to disappoint his Deep State masters, or to arouse their Trumpist opponents — he "capably" muddied the waters enough to keep the coup d'état going.

 

This obfuscation method, by the way, is typical of American government agencies' disinformation and suspicion planting.

 

 

Note

 

For numerous examples of that technique, take a look at William Blum's Killing Hope (Common Courage Press, 2004).

 

 

That Robert Mueller?

 

Recall that Robert Mueller headed the FBI when Classified Woman (2012) author — Sibel Edmonds — uncovered significant evidence that the FBI was coddling corporate-connected, terrorist-supporting, known foreign agents on its in-house staff.

 

Then Director Mueller (apparently) covered this scandal up. He used "national security" to "encourage" American courts to silence Edmonds and Congress.

 

Even if some Sibel Edmonds' allegations are incorrect as to detail or interpreted intent, the picture of corporate and agency corruption that she presents (from inside the FBI) is persuasive.

 

If you are a patriot, meaning someone hostile to foreign influences determining American national interests and foreign policy, Classified Woman's inside information will make your blood boil.

 

If you are curious as to how Edmonds comes across in person, watch this October 2017 video clip of her defending Lieutenant General (retired) Michael Flynn from Mueller's (outside-his-assigned-scope) targeting.

 

And if you do not have time to read Classified Woman, you can see Edmonds explaining some of what she experienced at the FBI, and afterward, here.

 

 

The moral? — Yes, one of our many high-ranking slimeball turds

 

Yeah, that Robert Mueller.

 

Next to him, President Trump — straightforwardly corrupt, perpetually lying and despicable human being though he is — arguably looks like the better twin.