Surprisingly high number of COVID vaccine adverse reaction reports — as compared to decades' worth of other vaccines — hmmm

02 December 2021

Not only are COVID vaccines arguably less effective than originally marketed to be, but . . .

. . . they seem to bother people in surprisingly high numbers.

Something needs to be explained. Yet nobody (apparently) is looking to do so.

Consider the following data

It comes from the World Health Organization's VigiAccess database:

VigiAccess was launched by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2015 to provide public access to information in VigiBase, the WHO global database of reported potential side effects of medicinal products.

Side effects – known technically as adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) – are reported by national pharmacovigilance centres or national drug regulatory authorities that are members of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring (PIDM).

First, I used the United States' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's list of commonly used American vaccines to create the following list.

Second, I went to VigiAccess and entered each vaccine, so as to retrieve the total number of adverse reaction reports for each one — worldwide — as of 01 December 2021.

Each entry is followed by the year that WHO's reporting for it first began.

The following entries run from the least number of adverse events to the most.

Guess where COVID-19 vaccines fall:

Vaccine	Adverse reactions	Year reporting began
adenovirus	187	2001
mumps	716	1972
cholera	1 833	1970
diphtheria	1 882	1979
pertussis	2 250	1972
rubella	2 624	1971
Japanese encephalitis	4 421	1984
measles	5 838	1968
smallpox	6 900	1968
anthrax	9 841	1984
rabies	12 389	1969
tetanus	15 147	1968
yellow fever	26 499	1969
hepatitis A	47 081	1989
rotavirus	69 768	2000
Haemophilis influenzae b	89 251	1986
hepatitis B	105 276	1984
hpv	115 637	2006
polio	122 571	1968
meningococcal	128 716	1976
varicella	190 765	1989
pneumococcal	239 484	1980
influenza	276 194	1968
COVID-19	2 642 138	2014
Data from VigiAccess.org		as of 01 December 2021

Does this comparative information mean anything . . .

. . . given unavoidable flaws in WHO's reporting system?

That's hard to say.

Notice that VigiAccess clumps varieties of (same disease) vaccines together under the same name.

Furthermore, it is difficult to miss that the COVID-19 data begins in 2014, when no such vaccines existed.

Fortunately, for our purposes, only 133 those (presumably bogus) reports preceded 2020, when COVID-19 vaccines first became available.

It is also medically questionable to lump adenovirus-carried COVID-19 vaccines together with mRNA-based ones. Their mechanisms of action are grossly different.

And I won't even begin to touch upon the problem posed by different nations' disparate medical surveillance and reporting abilities.

Obviously, with regard to COVID-19 vaccines, the majority of reporting comes from nations with some ability to (at least marginally) track negative reactions — if their health authorities are motivated, which is itself a big question.

Compare, for instance, the likelihood that most of the alleged Third World would be able to reasonably accurately surveil negative polio vaccine reactions — as compared to 'developed' public health infrastructures.

But still . . .

Why have public health authorities not commented on the above-listed — seemingly disproportionate — COVID-19 vaccine reaction disparities?

From this WHO data, existing SARS-CoV-2 vaccines look to be a treasure trove of negativities.

Especially so, considering that they work very noticeably less well — both as to efficacy and duration — than arguably every other vaccine on the above list.

The moral? — The 'System' is hiding information from the world's publics

Why would that be?

Clue:

Why is COVID-19 vaccination the only advertised avenue to health in the developed West?

Do you see Big Pharma, Fat Cat — and Government Tyrant — fingers everywhere in this pie?

PeteFree.com

Surprisingly high number of COVID vaccine adverse reaction reports — as compared to decades' worth of other vaccines — hmmm