Jim Hightower Admirably Explained How Plutocrats and Judges Pickpocket Our Wallets

© 2015 Peter Free

 

26 February 2015

 

 

Would anarchy be preferable to the corrupt system that we have now?

 

Maybe — at least we might get a few licks of our own in under a system that is not designed to suck our lives away (pun intended):

 

 

America's laws to deter corporate crime actually force victims to help subsidize the criminals.

 

First, a court orders a corporation to pay punitive damages to a victim of its criminal acts;

 

second, the corporate offender pays up, then merrily subtracts a big chunk of that payment from its income tax, effectively taking money out of our public treasury;

 

third, while the criminal is counting its tax break, the victim is notified that the punitive damage money he or she received from the corporation will be taxed as "regular income;"

 

fourth, that means a big chunk of the victim's payment effectively goes to replenish the public money the corporate villain subtracted.

 

Bad enough that corporate-financed lawmakers legalize such encouragement of criminality, but corporate-coddling judges are playing the same disgraceful game by drastically reducing the amounts that juries order corporations to pay.

 

© 2015 Jim Hightower, Corporate crime supported by a whirligig of legal favoritism, JimHightower.com (25 February 2015) (reformatted extracts)

 

 

The moral? — Terrorists are going after the wrong people

 

Maybe we just need to change the definition of infidel.

 

Think of this as an exercise in creating a more legitimate civics from scratch — where civics is defined as:

 

the study or science of the privileges and obligations of citizens.

© 2015 Random House, Civics, Dictionary.com (visited 26 February 2015)